Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Arbeit ; 32(2):111-132, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20235273

ABSTRACT

Since the Covid 19 pandemic, many office workers have got the option of working hybrid, i.e. alternating between working at home and in the office. As a result, cooperation with colleagues is increasingly being shifted to the virtual world. This may change not only the content of cooperation, but also the social relationships between employees. On the basis of the BAuA working time survey 2019 and 2021, we investigate whether there is a relation between the proportion of working from home and the assessment of collegial cooperation. Here we distinguish between formal, content-related collaboration and informal, personal collaboration. The results show that office workers rate both formal and informal cooperation worse as the proportion of work from home increases. However, formal collaboration in particular is rated better in 2021 than in 2019;experiences during the Covid- 19 pandemic may have led to learning effects in virtual collaboration.Alternate :Viele Bürobeschäftigte haben seit der Covid-19-Pandemie die Möglichkeit, hybrid, also im Wechsel zu Hause und im Büro, zu arbeiten. Die Zusammenarbeit mit Kolleginnen und Kollegen wird dadurch vermehrt ins Virtuelle verlagert. Hierdurch kann sich nicht nur die inhaltliche Zusammenarbeit, sondern können sich auch soziale Beziehungen zwischen Beschäftigten verändern. Auf Basis der BAuA-Arbeitszeitbefragung 2019 und 2021 wird untersucht, ob es einen Zusammenhang zwischen dem Anteil des Arbeitens von zu Hause und der Bewertung der kollegialen Zusammenarbeit gibt. Hierbei unterscheiden wir zwischen formeller, inhaltlicher Zusammenarbeit und informeller, persönlicher Zusammenarbeit. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Bürobeschäftigte mit zunehmendem Anteil der Arbeit von zu Hause sowohl die formelle als auch die informelle Zusammenarbeit schlechter bewerten. Dabei wird insbesondere die formelle Zusammenarbeit 2021 jedoch besser bewertet als noch 2019. Erfahrungen während der Covid-19-Pandemie haben hier möglicherweise zu Lerneffekten in der virtuellen Zusammenarbeit geführt.

2.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 143: 105858, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914936

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the workload and has affected physical and mental health of many employees. Hair cortisol concentration (HCC) has proven useful as a marker for retrospective assessment of stress in epidemiological studies and was measured here in non-healthcare night-shift workers with standard shifts (8-h shifts) and extended shifts (12-h shifts) before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Results showed a twofold increase in HCC among shift workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous measurements. Subjectively reported measures of psychosomatic stress were not found to be reliable predictors of HCC. No statistically significant HCC differences were found between rosters. Working 12-h shifts does not appear to be an additional stressor in the already demanding COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Shift Work Schedule , Hair , Humans , Hydrocortisone , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL